About your Search

Search Results 0 to 1 of about 2
. >> it is important to have a foreign policy to start with. you have to have some basic principles, the guidelines. that needs to an acute -- includingraq, afghanist, a whole lot of other countries as well. the problem is we have not had that. what it seems like the vacillating policies we have almost punished our friends and helped o enemies. we decided to turn our backs on two of our allies, the czech republic and poland. we had plans to build missile defense. we gave that is a concession to russia. how much has russia helped us with iran? how much has russia helped us with the situation in afghanistan? giving special attention to chavez and turning our back on netanyahu when he wanted to meet with the president, the sending of mixed signals is very destructive to foreign policy. in the case of egypt, for instance, we talked a little bit about that in a press release. this is a country that should be protectg our embassy. while we give the money? let's withholdny money for egypt until they start acting like a nation, protect our embassy, and start not fundamentally consulting us by built -- by b
these foreign policy decisions? >> what we are advocating here is that the court can make categorical judgments, not on the case by case factual judgment. we think there is more than one category between a situation like this one in which there is no connection to the united states are a situation like the one justice a leader raised about an american corporation. >> the use of the state department to deserve that. >> are you talking about a nexus test? that is what it sounds like to me. whether an act nexus -- what are you talking about? >> we are talking about something different. the question is whether to recognize a federal, ma cause of action. i think it depends -- >> either it exists or it does not. >> there are interests that had against recognizing causes of action. that is what he said. >> i am having trouble with this. without question, papyruses, attacks on a mass -- piracy, attacks on ambassadors, we know that those for internal norms in 1789. you seem to be suggesting that if a frenchman attacks and english ambassador in switzerland, that case would never be heard in the united st
Search Results 0 to 1 of about 2